E

A shepherd who stayed with his people through hard times.

Read the essentials →
July 17 · Bishop

St. Ennodius

St. Ennodius

A shepherd who stayed with his people through hard times.

Traditional feast

July 17
1914 / pre-1969 calendar, per Baring-Gould (1897)

Current feast

July 17
Secondary source · Wikipedia

Represents

Bishop

Their story

Adapted in modern English from the Catholic Encyclopedia (1913) · original text below

Ennodius was born probably at Arles in 474 and educated at Pavia, where he was engaged to be married. Instead he became a cleric and his fiancee became a nun. He was ordained deacon at Milan under his uncle, Bishop Laurentius, and taught in the schools there.

During the disputed election of 498 he supported Pope Symmachus. He defended the Palm Synod of 501 in a work that argued no human court may judge the pope. About 513 he became Bishop of Pavia. Twice, in 515 and 517, he led papal embassies for Pope Hormisdas to Emperor Anastasius at Constantinople. Both failed, and the second put the envoys' lives in danger.

He was the last of the old school of rhetoric. His poems, letters, autobiography and lives of Epiphanius of Pavia and Antony of Lerins are valuable sources for his age. His epitaph, found by chance, gives the date of his death, 17 July 521.

Early life

Selected sentences from the original account, unaltered.

Some account of this emperor has already been given in this jaiy * volume. 1 He was married to Ariadne, daughter of one emperor, widow of another.

What they represent

How they teach us to live

Drawn from themes in the original account

Be a peacemaker. Making peace is part of this story.

Stay faithful when it costs you. This account is about holding firm under pressure.

Pray a little every day. Prayer runs all through this account.

Learn from the kind of life it was. A shepherd who stayed with his people through hard times.

From the Catholic Encyclopedia

1913 · 721 words

Ennodius, Magnus Felix, rhetorician and bishop, b. probably at Arles, in Southern Gaul [roughly modern France and Belgium], in 474; d. at Pavia, Italy, July 17, 521. When quite young he went to Pavia, where he was educated, was betrothed, and eventually became a priest, his fiancée at the same time becoming a nun. It does not appear certain that he ever married. Shortly after the death of his benefactor, Epiphanius (496), he received minor orders [the lower ranks below deacon, such as reader and acolyte, abolished in 1972] at Milan, attracted thither no doubt by his uncle Laurentius, bishop of that city. Soon he was ordained deacon and taught in the schools. About this time (498) two popes were elected simultaneously, the deacon Symmachus and the archpriest Laurentius. King Theodoric was in favor of the former, and convened a council at Rome in 501, the famous Synodus Palmaris, to settle this question and put an end to much scandal. On this occasion Ennodius acted as secretary to Laurentius of Milan, who was the first to sign the decrees of the council. The adherents of the archpriest Laurentius, who was rejected by the council, wrote against the decisions of the latter. Ennodius answered them and defended the synod in a still extant work entitled "Libellus adversus eos qui contra synodum scribere praesumpserunt". After referring to the objections urged against the incompetency and irregularity of the council, he attacks the enemies of Symmachus and proclaims the inability of human judges to decide matters pertaining to popes: "God no doubt consented to the affairs of men being settled by men; He reserved to Himself the passing of judgment upon the pontiff of the supreme see" (Libellus, §93). In 513 Ennodius was still at Milan, but shortly afterwards he was made Bishop of Pavia. In 515 and 517 he headed two successive embassies which Pope Hormisdas sent to Emperor Anastasius at Constantinople, both of which, however, were barren of results. The unrelenting enmity of the emperor endangered the lives of the envoys in 517. Of the remaining years of his episcopate nothing is known. His epitaph, found by accident, gives the date of his death.

The works of Ennodius comprise poems for special occasions and epigrams, particularly inscriptions for churches or other religious monuments. His defense of the synod of 502, often known as "Libellus pro Synodo", his autobiography (Eucharisticum), his panegyric on King Theodoric, and the biographies of his predecessor Epiphanius of Milan, and a monk, Antonius of Lerins, are interesting from an historical point of view; the first four especially. As much can be said of his numerous letters, addressed to various correspondents. Notwithstanding their verbosity, they contain much useful information concerning the addressees and the customs of the time. Ennodius is the last representative of the ancient schools of rhetoric. His "Paraenesis didascalica" (511) celebrates the wonderful power of that foremost of the liberal arts, by which a guilty man is made to appear innocent, and vice versa. He illustrates his own method in a few declamatory exercises called "Dictiones"; they deal with themes once the delight of pagan rhetoricians, e.g. grief of Thetis on beholding the corpse of Achilles; Menelaus contemplating the ruins of Troy; the lament of Dido forsaken by Aeneas, etc. Again, with all the resources of his rhetoric he denounces a man who placed a statue of Minerva in a place of ill-repute; a player who gambled away the field in which his parents lay buried; etc. He shared the popular fallacy of his contemporaries who saw in the reign of Theodoric a revival of the Roman Empire under the control of men of letters. Ennodius remained to the end faithful to the academic traditions of the Roman schools, whose mythological apparatus he was the last to retain; thus in an epithalamium he describes the beauty of the nude Venus, and makes love argue against virginity. Nevertheless, he refutes elsewhere the fables of the poets and points out that the understanding of the Christian Scriptures is the highest intellectual ideal. In him are visible the two tendencies whose conflict is never quite absent from Christian life; outwardly he remains true to classic tradition. His diction is exuberant and florid, but occasionally manifests vigor. The best editions of his writings are those of Hartel, in the sixth volume of the "Corpus ecclesiasticorum latinorum" (Vienna, 1881), and of Vogel in "Monumenta Germanise Hist.: Auct." (Berlin, 1885), VII.

Read more

The full original · 1045 words

Read Baring-Gould’s full account

Baring-Gould’s sources: No mention in any ancient Martyrology. But inserted in the modern Roman Martyrology. Authority His own writings.] This saint was of illustrious family in Gaul; whether he was born at Arles or at Pavia is not certain. He was educated at Milan, where he studied elocution and poetry, living in the house of his aunt till her death, when he married a lady of wealth. He lived a careless life at first, but was struck with compunction, and with the consent of his wife lived thenceforth as a celibate, and took on him deacon’s orders, which were conferred on him by S. Epiphanius of Pavia.

In the furious contest between the rivals Symmachus and Laurence for the papal throne, S. Ennodius took part with the former, and after the Palmary Council, which acquitted Symmachus, had been impeached by the partisans of Laurence, S. Ennodius took up his pen to vindicate its decisions in an Apology, as he thought, eloquent, and therefore in parts altogether unintelligible.

In the East the formidable Scythian Vitalianus had raised the standard of rebellion and of orthodoxy against the aged Emperor Anastasius, suspected of Eutychian [followers of Eutyches, who said Christ had only a divine nature; condemned at Chalcedon in 451] leanings, but certainly striving to maintain religious peace on the basis of the Henoticon. Some account of this emperor has already been given in this jaiy * volume. 1 He was married to Ariadne, daughter of one emperor, widow of another. His one green, the other blue eye, was taken as a sign that his faith was not orthodox, his favour of the blue faction in the racecourse threw the green faction which had been favoured by Zeno, into hostility.

Anastasius wrote to pope Hormisdas, who, on the death of Symmachus in 514, had succeeded him on the papal throne, and proposed the summoning of a council at Heraclea. The project of the council dropped, but Hormisdas sent a deputation to Constantinople, consisting of four ambassadors, of whom Ennodius, now bishop of Pavia (a.d. 515), formed one. The instructions wherewith they were furnished are extant, a remarkable manual of ecclesiastical diplomacy in a nice and difficult affair. The great question which divided the East and the West at this time related to the dead patriarch [the title of the bishops of the great ancient sees: Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, Jerusalem] Acacius, the recognition by the emperor that he had been justly anathematized, and frank acceptance of the Tome of S. Leo and the decrees of Chalcedon. The legates were to demand of the emperor five things, without which the schism between the East and West could not be healed; 1st, his unequivocal assent to the Council of Chalcedon, and to the letters of S. Leo. If he yielded this point, they were to express their gratitude and to kiss the emperoris breast. Then, 2ndly, they were to require him to demand the same assent from all the clergy of the East; and to compel all to union with Rome. 3rdly, he was to anathematize Nestorius [Nestorius (d. c. 451), whose teaching split Christ into two persons; condemned at Ephesus in 431], Eutyches, Dioscorus, and all maintained of the Henoticon, Timothy the Weasel, patriarch of Alexandria, Peter the Stammerer, of Alexandria, Acacius, formerly bishop of Constantinople, and Peter 1 See Life of S. Flavian of Antioch, July 4. the Fuller of Antioch. 4th, the immediate recall from exile of all ecclesiastics who had refused the Henoticon, and were therefore in union with Rome; and lastly, that all who had ill-treated and wronged these latter should be tried and judged by the Apostolic See. On the full acceptance of these terms, Hormisdas consented to honour the future Council at Heraclea with his personal presence, not to deliberate, but to ratify his own solemn determination.

But Anastasius was not reduced to such extremities as to submit to such conditions as these. The memory of the gentle, peace-loving Acacius, was dear to the people of Constantinople. Anastasius expressed his entire acceptance of the decrees of Chalcedon, but refused to condemn Acacius. Why, he asked, should the living be kept excommunicated on account of the dead? The terms of Hormisdas could not be enforced without much bloodshed.

The embassy returned to Rome. Anastasius promised to send after it a deputation of bishops to the pope. Next year the deputation arrived, but it consisted of laymen, accredited to the Senate as well as to the Pope. Hormisdas treated these lay ambassadors, who presumed to interfere in ecclesiastical affairs, with contempt. The Senate made answer that no agreement could be come to, no hope of the establishment of peace be entertained, till the name of Acacius was struck out of the diptychs.

The Pope sent Ennodius with another legate [an official representative sent by the pope], Peregrinus of Misenum, on a second embassy to Constantinople, insisting sternly on the memory of Acacius being blotted out of public record in the prayers of the Church. That name on the diptychs barred union between the East and West. To pray for Acacius was 5. Ennodius.

a token that he was regarded as within the reach of the mercy of God, that his damnation was not an established fact. But Anastasius was now more secure upon his throne, the power of his rebellious antagonist, Vitalianus, had failed. He refused to abandon, to reprobate, the memory of Acacius, whom he had loved and revered. “We may submit to insult,” said the emperor, “ we may endure that our decrees be annulled, but we will not be commanded. Hormisdas must await the accession of a new emperor, before the churches of Rome and Byzantium are re-united by the sacrifice of him who, besides his communion with the Eutychians, dared to equal himself with the successor of S. Peter.” Then he drove the legates from his presence. They were dismissed through a back door, and embarked under the charge of the magistrini, and two prefects, Heliodonus and Demetrius, who were given strict orders not to suffer them to enter any city. But Ennodius and his companions found means to circulate their protests and send them to the bishops, who, however, sent them to the emperor.

The legates returned to Italy, and the strife shortly after ended with the death of Anastasius in the midst of a thunderstorm. * S. Ennodius resumed his pastoral work at Pavia; and showed great zeal in the conversion of souls, in succouring the needy, and in the building and adorning of churches. He composed poems on the Blessed Virgin, S. Cyprian, S. Stephen, S. Dionysius of Milan, S. Ambrose [bishop of Milan (d. 397)], S. Euphemia, S. Nazarius, S. Martin [St. Martin of Tours (d. 397), soldier turned bishop], on the Mysteries of Pentecost and the Ascension, on a baptistry he had adorned with pictures of martyrs whose relics [the bodily remains of a saint, or objects they used, kept with honor] were laid in it. He wrote two new forms of benediction for the Paschal candle, and an Eucharisticon, or Thanksgiving, in which he gives a short account of his life, especially of his conversion, and how, through the intercession of S. Victor, to whom he bore great devotion, he had obtained his wife’s consent to his taking the vow of celibacy.

He died on August 1st, 521, at the age of forty-eight.

Feast days

Feast: July 17

Nine days · Free

Pray the novena
with us.

One short email a day for nine days. The day's prayer, a line from St. Ennodius's story, and a nudge to keep going.

Also on July 17
S

Sts. Speratus and…

July 17 · Martyrs
St. Hyacinth

St. Hyacinth

July 17 · Martyr
St. Marcellina

St. Marcellina

July 17 · Virgin
← All 1726 saints in the library
Sources & notes

Feast-day sources

Story sources

Sources

Credits

From Sabine Baring-Gould, The Lives of the Saints, new edition in 16 vols. (London: John C. Nimmo, 1897–98); text from the Internet Archive scan (OCR, lightly cleaned; errors possible). Public domain.

From “Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Magnus Felix Ennodius,” The Catholic Encyclopedia (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1907–1914), via Wikisource. Public domain. Matched by name and feast date; text unedited except for our bracketed notes in grey.

From Sabine Baring-Gould, The Lives of the Saints, new edition in 16 vols. (London: John C. Nimmo, 1897–98); text from the Internet Archive scan (OCR, lightly cleaned; errors possible). Public domain in the United States. Reproduced unedited, except for short bracketed notes in grey that we added to explain names and terms (“S.” is the old abbreviation for Saint). Some history and judgments reflect 19th-century scholarship.